maybe

~James
Player of Septimius

I definitely do. While it is a significant allocation of GM time, dropping this class entirely is a poor decision. The restructuring of Empaths, and creation of Monks was a significant element of shifting the game towards a 3-spell circle universe, and while I would hardly say "we are almost there", I consider it a significant enough investment enough that what was started should be finished.

I've been waiting and excited for Savants for nearly a decade now, and I will continue to be so until they (hopefully) come out.
________________________________
>Barnom exclaims, "I smell delicious!"
>Barnom says, "Like sage and nutmeg.

>"Walkar says, "Yes, too many kings never work. Especially when there's only one throne. It's a wicked game."
>Shameless plug.

I have a concept for a savant in mind and hope to someday be able to play it. That said... I really, really, really hope that the development team doesn't tie up the bulk of their resources working on savants for the next few years. There are a lot of other things that I think a lot of us would prefer see get some development time. I suspect the dev team would prefer not to dive into Monk Redux anytime soon as well.

-- Robert

pasty white, with plate equiv armor while wearing robes. Fun times.

I think it was 190 lore ranks, and as a pure they can double in lores. So, at cap, you can have one in full plate equiv.

I had read it wrong. Thank you. I'm glad to see it's going to be a lot different than what I had thought.

R.