wand holding runestaves 09/27/2017 07:26 PM CDT
Could wand holding runestaves be re-classified as non-combat scripts? The current classification unduly penalizes the ability to get work done for them.

For example I have a 4x 2-mana flaring wand holding runestaff and just realized that Felthrop wouldn't be able to bump it up to 3-mana flaring due to the wand holding script.

Holding a wand in your off-hand doesn't affect your AS or DS, so effectively putting the wand in the staff has no combat advantage whatsoever.

I would appreciate if the script can be reclassified as a non-combat script.
Reply
Re: wand holding runestaves 09/27/2017 09:23 PM CDT
What makes you think a flare already on the staff wouldn't be able to be upgraded?

http://i.imgur.com/lsWPzG9.gif
Reply
Re: wand holding runestaves 09/27/2017 10:30 PM CDT
Ticket said no functional combat scripts. I asked Felthrop and he said yes he believes the wand-holding script is a combat script.
Reply
Re: wand holding runestaves 09/27/2017 10:55 PM CDT
Ah, yes that definitely is a Category D script.

http://i.imgur.com/lsWPzG9.gif
Reply
Re: wand holding runestaves 10/04/2017 12:25 PM CDT
yes / no / maybe so?
Reply
Re: wand holding runestaves 10/26/2017 05:09 PM CDT
GM1: I don't know anything about this system... (ignore)
GM2: I don't have the authority to decide (ignored)
GM3: whoa not touching this with a 10 foot pole! (ignore)
GM4: I'm just a moderator, all's right with the world (ignore)
GM5: Working on 3 other projects, will slot this in eventually... RSN (next 10-15 years! - quits in 6 months)
GM6: Don't worry, every message is read by a GM on the forums! (ignored)
Wyrom: Let's see if we can get someone to look at this... (5 min later...)
Random GM: No. Won't be done. (because I don't wanna, nyahhhhh~~ dismissed)
Reply