After lang Peccaries stop teaching TM well...what would be a good next step?
THETOS
FULTONJ1
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/09/2004 12:19 PM CDT
<<After lang Peccaries stop teaching TM well...what would be a good next step?
I have always enjoyed hanging around Therengia, so ...
You can move out onto the hummocks and fight fendryads and the swamp trolls out there. Keep your burden less than somewhat and you shouldn't fall in (unless you have bad leg injuries).
*Fendryads use a TM spell to cast thorns at you*
*you can always dive if you get in trouble, just don't swim for very long*
You can also come up to Rossman's Landing and take on the orc scouts.
*They use slings so you need to be good against ranged attacks*
*The warcats there are stealth critters and will sneak in and ambush*
Bristle back peccs in Rossman's Landing
*Stand with only one if you are a plinker type mage, or cast fire rain and keep retreating. They are a couple levels harder than the small peccs and you will want to pick up a dozen more circles to begin to feel comfortable dancing with them*
Trebber
I have always enjoyed hanging around Therengia, so ...
You can move out onto the hummocks and fight fendryads and the swamp trolls out there. Keep your burden less than somewhat and you shouldn't fall in (unless you have bad leg injuries).
*Fendryads use a TM spell to cast thorns at you*
*you can always dive if you get in trouble, just don't swim for very long*
You can also come up to Rossman's Landing and take on the orc scouts.
*They use slings so you need to be good against ranged attacks*
*The warcats there are stealth critters and will sneak in and ambush*
Bristle back peccs in Rossman's Landing
*Stand with only one if you are a plinker type mage, or cast fire rain and keep retreating. They are a couple levels harder than the small peccs and you will want to pick up a dozen more circles to begin to feel comfortable dancing with them*
Trebber
MARGASH
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/09/2004 01:43 PM CDT
I copy/pasted part of Soim's critter stuff at the end of this post. Lang peccs are at the very bottom (cause you said they are too easy now) and are around 33rd level creature.
Trebber advised bristle back peccaries...I'd say they're too big for you now. If anything, go to caracals first (cause that's a good hunting ground).
Player of Tessaa
_________________________
ADAN'F BLOOD WARRIOR:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
ADAN'F SHADOW MAGE:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
FENDRYARD: (LANG in Water)
(50th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
VELAKAN SLAVER:
(approx 48th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
CARACALS:
(46th Lev) {listed at 48} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -5 is well beneath your abilities.
CLOUDED ARZUMOS:
(45th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
RHOAT MODA:
(43th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
MRISS PECCS:
(42rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -7 is a harmless opponent.
RIVER BOA:
(41rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FENDRYAD: (LANG Hummock version)
(39th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
CROSSING DEATH SPIRIT:
(38th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
MOTTLED WESTANURYN: (Muspari version)
(37th) {stated 40th} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SWAMP TROLL: (LANG Version)
(36th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ALLEY THUG:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
UR HHRKI'IZH:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
SMALL PECCARY: (LANG & Shard)
(33th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -10 is something you could wipe the floor with.
Trebber advised bristle back peccaries...I'd say they're too big for you now. If anything, go to caracals first (cause that's a good hunting ground).
Player of Tessaa
_________________________
ADAN'F BLOOD WARRIOR:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
ADAN'F SHADOW MAGE:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
FENDRYARD: (LANG in Water)
(50th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
VELAKAN SLAVER:
(approx 48th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
CARACALS:
(46th Lev) {listed at 48} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -5 is well beneath your abilities.
CLOUDED ARZUMOS:
(45th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
RHOAT MODA:
(43th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
MRISS PECCS:
(42rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -7 is a harmless opponent.
RIVER BOA:
(41rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
| FOURTH RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME |
FENDRYAD: (LANG Hummock version)
(39th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
CROSSING DEATH SPIRIT:
(38th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
MOTTLED WESTANURYN: (Muspari version)
(37th) {stated 40th} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
| FIFTH RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME |
SWAMP TROLL: (LANG Version)
(36th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ALLEY THUG:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
UR HHRKI'IZH:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
SMALL PECCARY: (LANG & Shard)
(33th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -10 is something you could wipe the floor with.
THETOS
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/09/2004 02:15 PM CDT
just out of curiousity...is there a complete list of Soim's critter stuff anywhere on the internet? If not can you post it or send the complete list to my e-mail?(jcagle@kent.edu)
Thanks for the help:)
_Aerander
Thanks for the help:)
_Aerander
JUASON
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/09/2004 09:34 PM CDT
Aye, I would like a copy as well if it is available to the public. My thanks in advance!! Juason@wowway.com
Critter info is always such a big help :P
http://www.wowway.com/~dgossiaux/simucon/ - SIMUCON 2004 PHOTOS!!
Critter info is always such a big help :P
http://www.wowway.com/~dgossiaux/simucon/ - SIMUCON 2004 PHOTOS!!
ORRJ
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/10/2004 02:46 AM CDT
How much perception do you need to start to see the smaller warcats? I assume there ambush hits less and less harder the more perceptive you get? Also I have a spell slot open, would getting earth sense be worth it in this aspect? Although I guess that would be all it would be worth it for?(As in does it do much of anything else besides teach PM/harness?)
~Worrclan, Dwarf of the Realms-
~Worrclan, Dwarf of the Realms-
FULTONJ1
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/10/2004 07:50 AM CDT
<<How much perception do you need to start to see the smaller warcats? I assume there ambush hits less and less harder the more perceptive you get? Also I have a spell slot open, would getting earth sense be worth it in this aspect? Although I guess that would be all it would be worth it for?(As in does it do much of anything else besides teach PM/harness?)
Hmmm, not sure how much perception I needed to see the warcats. 200 is a safe number. The number I was concerned about the most was how much concentration did I need to resist their hypnotize spell. (I know it isn't based off concentration but instead a mental resistance. But concentration is such an easy way to gauge that). I noticed once I hit 400 in concentration, I was resisting their spell all the time.
Earth Sense would help, but you would be casting it all the time if you didn't see them sneak into the room. I have no idea if perception will lessen their ambush attack, but it does get less and less the more you train up your defenses. Perhaps a stealthy person could answer the ambush attack question.
Trebber
Hmmm, not sure how much perception I needed to see the warcats. 200 is a safe number. The number I was concerned about the most was how much concentration did I need to resist their hypnotize spell. (I know it isn't based off concentration but instead a mental resistance. But concentration is such an easy way to gauge that). I noticed once I hit 400 in concentration, I was resisting their spell all the time.
Earth Sense would help, but you would be casting it all the time if you didn't see them sneak into the room. I have no idea if perception will lessen their ambush attack, but it does get less and less the more you train up your defenses. Perhaps a stealthy person could answer the ambush attack question.
Trebber
MARGASH
Re: Question concerning critter advancement
09/10/2004 11:00 AM CDT
>I have no idea if perception will lessen their ambush attack, but it does get less and less the more you train up your defenses. Perhaps a stealthy person could answer the ambush attack question.
Assuming creature ambush = player ambush...
Ambush checks the ambusher's hiding against the target's perception. If successful the ambusher gains a bonus in hitting the target.
Player of Tessaa
Assuming creature ambush = player ambush...
Ambush checks the ambusher's hiding against the target's perception. If successful the ambusher gains a bonus in hitting the target.
Player of Tessaa
MARGASH
Re: Question concerning critter advancement (long)
09/10/2004 11:06 AM CDT
>just out of curiousity...is there a complete list of Soim's critter stuff anywhere on the internet? If not can you post it or send the complete list to my e-mail?(jcagle@kent.edu)
>Thanks for the help:)
>Aerander
>Aye, I would like a copy as well if it is available to the public. My thanks in advance!! Juason@wowway.com
>Critter info is always such a big help :P
>Renwolf
Oh man. This is gonna be long. I'm posting because I'm too lazy to send out to you guys individually. Here's my drcreatures.txt notes copy/pasted. Includes stealth progressiojn chart by Ssra, post about higher level hunting by Damissak (that one is getting old) and Soim's critter stuff.
Sorry to all for the length.
Oh, keep in mind also that the bestiary on the DR website should be up to date for all island creatures. I forget the GM who did it but she fixed it a few months back. I gave her a hard time and pointed out a few errors and I'm pretty sure it's accurate now.
Player of Tessaa
P.s. To cut down on length a little bit I didn't include the full appraisals at the end but they're available.
______________________________________
Stealth Progression (Skill)
0-14 15-29 30-49 50-99 100-149 150-199 200-299 300-399 400+
ship rat jackal silver leucro fire sprite grave worm black leucro rock guardian zombie nomad seordmaor
hog boggle fenrae reaver rock troll crocodile kartais peccary adan'f mage & warrior celpeze
goblin kobold wind hound sand sprite viper small peccary fendryad angiswaerd poloh'izh
kelpie eel snowbeast swain (Ratha) Lang swamp troll darvager elsralael Adan'f Spirit Dancer
badger bone wolf gargoyle kra'hei hatchling Undershard (Spire Area) geni malchata
madman wood troll Undershard (NOT the Spire/Arena) caracal Lun'Shele Hunter sky giant
boar Wir Dinego
pothanit Dragon Priest
trollkin Warklin Mauler
Trekhalo
This list is merely a guide to help you know what range of creature you're looking for. These are only SUGGESTED creatures. Move up and down the ladder until you find something that will teach you. There are many, many more creatures available than are listed here. Each character is different and there are many variables -- armor hindrance, wounds, stats, skill, bonuses. Yes, there is some overlap between each "class" listed here based on proximity to target, etc.
Have fun! Thanks!
Ssra
D O
+9 +12 is a mythical being of immense power and ability.
+8 +11 is a master that's well beyond your abilities.
+7 is something you couldn't hope to hurt.
+6 is well above your abilities.
+10 is something that could tear you to shreds.
+9 is something that'd kill you quickly
+8 is an extremely skillful opponent.
+5 +7 is a truly skilled opponent.
+4 +6 is a very difficult opponent.
+3 +5 is a quite difficult opponent.
+2 +4 is a rather difficult opponent.
+1 +3 is a difficult opponent.
+2 is a challenging opponent.
+1 is a solid opponent.
+0 +0 is a worthy opponent. <<At your level of exp>>
-1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
-1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
-2 is a less skilled opponent.
-3 is a definitely less skilled opponent.
-2 -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
-3 -5 is an easy opponent.
-4 -6 is a simple opponent.
-5 -7 is well beneath your abilities.
-6 is a very easy opponent.
-7 is a harmless opponent.
-8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
-9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
-10 is something you can wipe the floor with.
-11 is a creature completely beneath your notice.
Category The Barbarians (14)
Topic Barbarian Ability - The Dances (8)
By DR-DAMISSAK from PLAY.NET
On May 14, 2002 at 13:35
Message Re: When do dances become a necessity? (179)
Life beyond Nightstalkers (55th), Dolomars (53rd), Caracals (48th), Adan'f (50th), Elsrael (50th), Zombie Nomads (50th)....
The options beyond Nightstalkers and Caracals is more limited than life before. However, I feel there are still options (and hopefully those options are becoming more and more viable).
I'll include the creeature levels in the discussion so you can get an idea of where they stand in relation to one another.
The Sleek Hele'la (58th) will take you up a few steps. You'll want to be able to swim, though.
The area beyond the Temple in the Gate of Souls (creatures ranging from 58th to 61st) is certainly one area that is supposed to fill a void. Is it a tough hunt there? Yep. Tough to get help? Yeah. Some good experience and money and right next door to Crossings? Yeaps.
The Germish'din (61st) have become a much, much more viable hunting area of late. GM Rigby has done some good work in updating their attack.
The Kra'Hei (60th) on Ratha are a very tough hunt for their level. Hopefully the Magic rewrite will bring them some viability.
There will be two more creatures / hunting areas (new to Elanthia) released in the 58th to 62nd creature level range before the month is out (or soon after). You'll need decent climbing to get into either (PAFO <g>).
The Wir Dinego (62nd) are certainly an option. As they throw bones at you, shield ranks are a plus. I know the moonies use (or used) this area quite extensively for TM training.
The Armored Warklins and Warklin Maulers (both 65th) have been transitioning (as I've tried to work out the web attack). According to the latest reports, they are huntable again. They are also found very close to Crossings (and on Pokepe <g>). A pain to get drug out but probably not too bad getting someone to come in.
The Lun'shele Hunters (62nd) and Trekhalo (66th) seem to be a great hunt in their range. It may be a bit of a step straight from Caracals, but there are quite a few options to fills that void.
The Dragon Priests (65th) in Shard should become much more viable post the Magic rewrite.
The Seordmaors (68th) will also benefit from the Magic rewrite. They aren't the best creature for training weapons (due to fairly low stamina), but they certainly fill a niche.
The Snaer Hafwa (70th) aren't the best hunt but they are viable for a bit to get some ranks.
The Asaren Celpeze (75th) are a sweet hunt for a Barbarian (in terms of experience gain). They do swarm. And they are not an easy fight. And yes, they area is desolate if you find yourself needing help.
The Adan'f Spirit Dancers (75th) require a shield to hunt them for the most part (due to the acid clouds). Also in that area are some higher level Mages and Warriors (60th).
I think we are actually in good shape (strong) up to this point as far as hunting options (and I've likely forgotten one or two). Yes, some of those listed need some work (and I feel its on the way for several of them). It is beyond this range where things start to get slim (the listed range teaching up to 550ish ranks). That means we are pretty solid right up to 100th circle (560 ranks). Every province is covered (and some multiple times).
Beyond that point, the pickings are currently slim..
We have Poloh'izh (85th), Malchata (95th), and Zombies (flex - I want to see the Zombies go / change). The Poloh'izh and Malachata are both very tough hunts. I think you can expect to see that continue for creature teaching in that rank range (560+). You aren't likely to find 100th level Peccaries / Caracals on my watch.
Development will continue in that range as more people approach it. I've promised Veldehar (or whoever is the highest at any given time) that he would always have something to hunt that will teach him. There will never be a ton of options in that top-most slot, though. Usage simply does not warrant it. If you look where we were a year ago for creatures in the 60+ range and where we are today, I think you can see the great strides we have made as more characters have reached those levels. Do I wish we could stay two steps ahead? Yes. Can we? No. Those at the top-most levels simply push up too fast (try as we might).
Just some idle thoughts from this side,
GM Damissak
Adan'f Mage/Warrior (50th) Whistling Wood
Adan'f Mage/Warrior (60th) Ice Cave
Elsrael (50th)
Zombie Nomads (50th)
Dolomars (53rd)
Dobek Moruryn (53th)
Nightstalkers (55th)
Bristle back peccs (55th)
Sleek Hele'la (58th)
Temple in the Gate of Souls
(ranging from 58th/61st)
Kra'Hei (60th)
Germish'din (61st)
Wir Dinego crossing (62nd)
Lun'shele Hunters (62nd)
Telga Moradu (63)
Armored Warklins (65th)
Warklin Maulers (65th)
Dragon Priests (65th)
Red Orc Raiders (65)
Red Orc Clan-Chief (67)
Trekhalo (66th)
Seordmaors (68th)
Snaer Hafwa (70th)
Asaren Celpeze (75th)
Adan'f Spirit Dancers (75th)
[Also a very rare super one 85?]
Poloh'izh (85th)
Malchata (95th)
Wir Dinego Aesry (FLEX)
Zombies (FLEX)
HARA:
Bawdy Swain - high 20s
Heggarangi Boars - 30th
Corsair - mid 30s
River Boa - 40th
Clouded Arzumo - mid 40s
Retan Dolomar - low 50s
Sleek Hele'la - high 50s
Telga Moradu - low 60s
Seormaors - high 60s
Poloh'izh - mid 80s
THIRD RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
SKY GIANT:
(100th) * NOV 29th, 2003
There offensive versus me +4 is a rather difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +5 is a truly skilled opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SECOND RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
S'SUGI MALCHATA:
(95th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
POLOH'IZH:
(85th) * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
WAR MAMMOTH:
(80th) * NOV 29th, 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FIRST RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
ADANF DANCERS: (Caves)
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +4 is a very difficult opponent.
RED BEAR ORC CLAN-CHIEF:
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +4 is a very difficult opponent.
ASAREN CELPEZE:
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MY RANGE OF CRITTER
RED BEAR ORC RAIDER:
(72th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
LUN'SHELE TREKHALO:
(72nd ) {Stated 66th} * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
SNAER HAFWA:
(70th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
SCALY SEORDMAOR: (Theren)
(68th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
WARKLIN MAULERS:
(65th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FIRST RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
DRAGON PRIESTS:
(65th) * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
ARMORED WARKLINS:
(65th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
TELGA MORADU:
(63nd Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
LUN'SHELE HUNTERS:
(62nd) * DEC 3rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
WIR DINEGO:
(62nd Lev) * (AESRY) NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
MISSHAPEN GERMISH'DIN:
(61st Lev) * NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
KRA'HEI:
(60st Lev) * NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
BRISTLE-BACKED PECCARY:
(approx 59th Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
DOLOMARS:
(59th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SECOND RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
ONE-EYED ARCHER:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
GELV CYCLOPS:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
RED BEAR ORC REIVER:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
ZOMBIE NOMAD:
(approx 55th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
NIGHTSTALKER UNYN: (Aesry)
(55th Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
SABRE-TOOTHED WARCAT
(55th Lev) * Nov 29rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
NIGHTSTALKER UNYN: (Haven)
(53th Lev) {stated 58th} * DEC 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
SLEEK HELE'LA:
(53th Lev) {stated 58th} * DEC 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
DOBEK MORURYN:
(53rd Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
MARBLED ANGISWAERD:
(52nd) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ELSRAEL: (HARA & LANGEN)
(51st Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
THIRD RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
ADAN'F BLOOD WARRIOR:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
ADAN'F SHADOW MAGE:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
FENDRYARD: (LANG in Water)
(50th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
VELAKAN SLAVER:
(approx 48th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
CARACALS:
(46th Lev) {listed at 48} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -5 is well beneath your abilities.
CLOUDED ARZUMOS:
(45th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
RHOAT MODA:
(43th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
MRISS PECCS:
(42rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -7 is a harmless opponent.
RIVER BOA:
(41rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FENDRYAD: (LANG Hummock version)
(39th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
CROSSING DEATH SPIRIT:
(38th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
MOTTLED WESTANURYN: (Muspari version)
(37th) {stated 40th} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SWAMP TROLL: (LANG Version)
(36th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ALLEY THUG:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
UR HHRKI'IZH:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
SMALL PECCARY: (LANG & Shard)
(33th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -10 is something you could wipe the floor with.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>Thanks for the help:)
>Aerander
>Aye, I would like a copy as well if it is available to the public. My thanks in advance!! Juason@wowway.com
>Critter info is always such a big help :P
>Renwolf
Oh man. This is gonna be long. I'm posting because I'm too lazy to send out to you guys individually. Here's my drcreatures.txt notes copy/pasted. Includes stealth progressiojn chart by Ssra, post about higher level hunting by Damissak (that one is getting old) and Soim's critter stuff.
Sorry to all for the length.
Oh, keep in mind also that the bestiary on the DR website should be up to date for all island creatures. I forget the GM who did it but she fixed it a few months back. I gave her a hard time and pointed out a few errors and I'm pretty sure it's accurate now.
Player of Tessaa
P.s. To cut down on length a little bit I didn't include the full appraisals at the end but they're available.
______________________________________
Stealth Progression (Skill)
0-14 15-29 30-49 50-99 100-149 150-199 200-299 300-399 400+
ship rat jackal silver leucro fire sprite grave worm black leucro rock guardian zombie nomad seordmaor
hog boggle fenrae reaver rock troll crocodile kartais peccary adan'f mage & warrior celpeze
goblin kobold wind hound sand sprite viper small peccary fendryad angiswaerd poloh'izh
kelpie eel snowbeast swain (Ratha) Lang swamp troll darvager elsralael Adan'f Spirit Dancer
badger bone wolf gargoyle kra'hei hatchling Undershard (Spire Area) geni malchata
madman wood troll Undershard (NOT the Spire/Arena) caracal Lun'Shele Hunter sky giant
boar Wir Dinego
pothanit Dragon Priest
trollkin Warklin Mauler
Trekhalo
This list is merely a guide to help you know what range of creature you're looking for. These are only SUGGESTED creatures. Move up and down the ladder until you find something that will teach you. There are many, many more creatures available than are listed here. Each character is different and there are many variables -- armor hindrance, wounds, stats, skill, bonuses. Yes, there is some overlap between each "class" listed here based on proximity to target, etc.
Have fun! Thanks!
Ssra
D O
+9 +12 is a mythical being of immense power and ability.
+8 +11 is a master that's well beyond your abilities.
+7 is something you couldn't hope to hurt.
+6 is well above your abilities.
+10 is something that could tear you to shreds.
+9 is something that'd kill you quickly
+8 is an extremely skillful opponent.
+5 +7 is a truly skilled opponent.
+4 +6 is a very difficult opponent.
+3 +5 is a quite difficult opponent.
+2 +4 is a rather difficult opponent.
+1 +3 is a difficult opponent.
+2 is a challenging opponent.
+1 is a solid opponent.
+0 +0 is a worthy opponent. <<At your level of exp>>
-1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
-1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
-2 is a less skilled opponent.
-3 is a definitely less skilled opponent.
-2 -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
-3 -5 is an easy opponent.
-4 -6 is a simple opponent.
-5 -7 is well beneath your abilities.
-6 is a very easy opponent.
-7 is a harmless opponent.
-8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
-9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
-10 is something you can wipe the floor with.
-11 is a creature completely beneath your notice.
Category The Barbarians (14)
Topic Barbarian Ability - The Dances (8)
By DR-DAMISSAK from PLAY.NET
On May 14, 2002 at 13:35
Message Re: When do dances become a necessity? (179)
Life beyond Nightstalkers (55th), Dolomars (53rd), Caracals (48th), Adan'f (50th), Elsrael (50th), Zombie Nomads (50th)....
The options beyond Nightstalkers and Caracals is more limited than life before. However, I feel there are still options (and hopefully those options are becoming more and more viable).
I'll include the creeature levels in the discussion so you can get an idea of where they stand in relation to one another.
The Sleek Hele'la (58th) will take you up a few steps. You'll want to be able to swim, though.
The area beyond the Temple in the Gate of Souls (creatures ranging from 58th to 61st) is certainly one area that is supposed to fill a void. Is it a tough hunt there? Yep. Tough to get help? Yeah. Some good experience and money and right next door to Crossings? Yeaps.
The Germish'din (61st) have become a much, much more viable hunting area of late. GM Rigby has done some good work in updating their attack.
The Kra'Hei (60th) on Ratha are a very tough hunt for their level. Hopefully the Magic rewrite will bring them some viability.
There will be two more creatures / hunting areas (new to Elanthia) released in the 58th to 62nd creature level range before the month is out (or soon after). You'll need decent climbing to get into either (PAFO <g>).
The Wir Dinego (62nd) are certainly an option. As they throw bones at you, shield ranks are a plus. I know the moonies use (or used) this area quite extensively for TM training.
The Armored Warklins and Warklin Maulers (both 65th) have been transitioning (as I've tried to work out the web attack). According to the latest reports, they are huntable again. They are also found very close to Crossings (and on Pokepe <g>). A pain to get drug out but probably not too bad getting someone to come in.
The Lun'shele Hunters (62nd) and Trekhalo (66th) seem to be a great hunt in their range. It may be a bit of a step straight from Caracals, but there are quite a few options to fills that void.
The Dragon Priests (65th) in Shard should become much more viable post the Magic rewrite.
The Seordmaors (68th) will also benefit from the Magic rewrite. They aren't the best creature for training weapons (due to fairly low stamina), but they certainly fill a niche.
The Snaer Hafwa (70th) aren't the best hunt but they are viable for a bit to get some ranks.
The Asaren Celpeze (75th) are a sweet hunt for a Barbarian (in terms of experience gain). They do swarm. And they are not an easy fight. And yes, they area is desolate if you find yourself needing help.
The Adan'f Spirit Dancers (75th) require a shield to hunt them for the most part (due to the acid clouds). Also in that area are some higher level Mages and Warriors (60th).
I think we are actually in good shape (strong) up to this point as far as hunting options (and I've likely forgotten one or two). Yes, some of those listed need some work (and I feel its on the way for several of them). It is beyond this range where things start to get slim (the listed range teaching up to 550ish ranks). That means we are pretty solid right up to 100th circle (560 ranks). Every province is covered (and some multiple times).
Beyond that point, the pickings are currently slim..
We have Poloh'izh (85th), Malchata (95th), and Zombies (flex - I want to see the Zombies go / change). The Poloh'izh and Malachata are both very tough hunts. I think you can expect to see that continue for creature teaching in that rank range (560+). You aren't likely to find 100th level Peccaries / Caracals on my watch.
Development will continue in that range as more people approach it. I've promised Veldehar (or whoever is the highest at any given time) that he would always have something to hunt that will teach him. There will never be a ton of options in that top-most slot, though. Usage simply does not warrant it. If you look where we were a year ago for creatures in the 60+ range and where we are today, I think you can see the great strides we have made as more characters have reached those levels. Do I wish we could stay two steps ahead? Yes. Can we? No. Those at the top-most levels simply push up too fast (try as we might).
Just some idle thoughts from this side,
GM Damissak
Adan'f Mage/Warrior (50th) Whistling Wood
Adan'f Mage/Warrior (60th) Ice Cave
Elsrael (50th)
Zombie Nomads (50th)
Dolomars (53rd)
Dobek Moruryn (53th)
Nightstalkers (55th)
Bristle back peccs (55th)
Sleek Hele'la (58th)
Temple in the Gate of Souls
(ranging from 58th/61st)
Kra'Hei (60th)
Germish'din (61st)
Wir Dinego crossing (62nd)
Lun'shele Hunters (62nd)
Telga Moradu (63)
Armored Warklins (65th)
Warklin Maulers (65th)
Dragon Priests (65th)
Red Orc Raiders (65)
Red Orc Clan-Chief (67)
Trekhalo (66th)
Seordmaors (68th)
Snaer Hafwa (70th)
Asaren Celpeze (75th)
Adan'f Spirit Dancers (75th)
[Also a very rare super one 85?]
Poloh'izh (85th)
Malchata (95th)
Wir Dinego Aesry (FLEX)
Zombies (FLEX)
HARA:
Bawdy Swain - high 20s
Heggarangi Boars - 30th
Corsair - mid 30s
River Boa - 40th
Clouded Arzumo - mid 40s
Retan Dolomar - low 50s
Sleek Hele'la - high 50s
Telga Moradu - low 60s
Seormaors - high 60s
Poloh'izh - mid 80s
THIRD RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
SKY GIANT:
(100th) * NOV 29th, 2003
There offensive versus me +4 is a rather difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +5 is a truly skilled opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SECOND RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
S'SUGI MALCHATA:
(95th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
POLOH'IZH:
(85th) * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
WAR MAMMOTH:
(80th) * NOV 29th, 2003
There offensive versus me +3 is a difficult opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FIRST RANGE OF CRITTER OVER ME
ADANF DANCERS: (Caves)
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +4 is a very difficult opponent.
RED BEAR ORC CLAN-CHIEF:
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +4 is a very difficult opponent.
ASAREN CELPEZE:
(75th Lev) * NOV 23th, 2003
There offensive versus me +1 is a solid opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MY RANGE OF CRITTER
RED BEAR ORC RAIDER:
(72th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
LUN'SHELE TREKHALO:
(72nd ) {Stated 66th} * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
SNAER HAFWA:
(70th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
SCALY SEORDMAOR: (Theren)
(68th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
WARKLIN MAULERS:
(65th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FIRST RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
DRAGON PRIESTS:
(65th) * DEC 9th 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
ARMORED WARKLINS:
(65th) * DEC 3rd, 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me 0 is a worthy opponent.
TELGA MORADU:
(63nd Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
There offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
There defensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
LUN'SHELE HUNTERS:
(62nd) * DEC 3rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me +3 is a quite difficult opponent.
WIR DINEGO:
(62nd Lev) * (AESRY) NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
MISSHAPEN GERMISH'DIN:
(61st Lev) * NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there oefensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
KRA'HEI:
(60st Lev) * NOV 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
BRISTLE-BACKED PECCARY:
(approx 59th Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
DOLOMARS:
(59th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -1 is a slightly less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SECOND RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
ONE-EYED ARCHER:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
GELV CYCLOPS:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
RED BEAR ORC REIVER:
(Approx 56th) * NOV 29th, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me +2 is a rather difficult opponent.
ZOMBIE NOMAD:
(approx 55th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
NIGHTSTALKER UNYN: (Aesry)
(55th Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
SABRE-TOOTHED WARCAT
(55th Lev) * Nov 29rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
NIGHTSTALKER UNYN: (Haven)
(53th Lev) {stated 58th} * DEC 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
SLEEK HELE'LA:
(53th Lev) {stated 58th} * DEC 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
DOBEK MORURYN:
(53rd Lev) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
MARBLED ANGISWAERD:
(52nd) * Nov 23rd, 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ELSRAEL: (HARA & LANGEN)
(51st Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -2 is a less skilled opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
THIRD RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME
ADAN'F BLOOD WARRIOR:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
ADAN'F SHADOW MAGE:
(50th Lev) * NOV 23rd 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
FENDRYARD: (LANG in Water)
(50th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me +1 is a difficult opponent.
VELAKAN SLAVER:
(approx 48th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -1 is a somewhat skilled opponent.
CARACALS:
(46th Lev) {listed at 48} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -5 is well beneath your abilities.
CLOUDED ARZUMOS:
(45th Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
RHOAT MODA:
(43th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -6 is a very easy opponent.
MRISS PECCS:
(42rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -7 is a harmless opponent.
RIVER BOA:
(41rd Lev) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -3 is definitely less skilled.
there defensive versus me -8 is something that you'd kill quickly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
| FOURTH RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME |
FENDRYAD: (LANG Hummock version)
(39th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -2 is a relatively easy opponent.
CROSSING DEATH SPIRIT:
(38th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
MOTTLED WESTANURYN: (Muspari version)
(37th) {stated 40th} * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -4 is a relatively easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -9 is something that you could tear to shreds.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
| FIFTH RANGE OF CRITTER UNDER ME |
SWAMP TROLL: (LANG Version)
(36th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -3 is an easy opponent.
ALLEY THUG:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
UR HHRKI'IZH:
(35th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -4 is a simple opponent.
SMALL PECCARY: (LANG & Shard)
(33th) * Dec 9th 2003
there offensive versus me -5 is an easy opponent.
there defensive versus me -10 is something you could wipe the floor with.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
| ONES I STILL WANT TO APP | |||
| S'LAI SCREAMER | 75th | ||
| GIANT BLADE SPIDER | 47th |
CURINIR
Re: Question concerning critter advancement (long)
09/10/2004 01:01 PM CDT
Hey, thanks for posting all that Tessaa.
~Curi
"Don't drink and park. Accidents make people."
~Curi
"Don't drink and park. Accidents make people."
