The remove abuser 02/07/2016 11:35 PM CST
Whoever keeps coming through and kicking every non-Ranger out several times a day, cut it out.


AIM: the_sly_fox
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 02/08/2016 07:41 AM CST
I'll go ahead and mention that if someone is found to be abusing it, you should stop, because you'll end up with warnings and will probably lose your ability to remove people as well.

---
NaOH+HI
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 02/18/2016 03:08 PM CST

Is there an appropriate channel for reporting abuse of this feature? I'm sad that it doesn't even tell you who ordered the removal. It's gotten to the point occasionally where I don't even like hanging out there because a lot of the people I know have stopped coming around due to the constant removals.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 02/18/2016 03:33 PM CST
>>I'm sad that it doesn't even tell you who ordered the removal.

My guess is that if someone is harassing people in the guild, the last thing you then want to do is tell them who made them stop (since it encourages future harassment toward that person).

That said, even if you're not told who did it I would be extremely surprised if GMs can't see who did it. So if you let the GMs know "person A B and C were removed unfairly and it's pretty annoying" a GM could see who is responsible and respond accordingly.



Uzmam! The Chairman will NOT be pleased to know you're trying to build outside of approved zones. I'd hate for you to be charged the taxes needed to have this place re-zoned. Head for the manor if you're feeling creative.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 02/18/2016 03:55 PM CST
Assisting in game would be the proper channel.

---
NaOH+HI
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 09:21 AM CST
It would also be nice to not be randomly assaulted by people trying to disrupt people they suspect of scripting.



Artilius reveals himself.
Artilius roars and draws his arms back. A dark, transparent blue glow ripples down his arms, crackling with the muted growl of a bear as it shapes itself into two large claws.
Artilius lashes out with both arms, sending a concussive wave of blue force outwards all around him!
The wave of blue force blasts you backwards, and you collapse in an ungainly heap!
Roundtime: 4 sec.
Xxxxx is blasted backwards, collapsing into a heap on the ground!
Xxxxx is blasted backwards, but maintains his footing.
Xxxxx is blasted backwards, collapsing into a heap on the ground!
Xxxxx is blasted backwards, collapsing into a heap on the ground!
Xxxxx is blasted backwards, collapsing into a heap on the ground!

The bluish energy forming the claws disperses into the air after the attack.
Artilius's actions quickly stir up a ruckus in the area, as annoyed citizens quickly move out of the way. One mentions to his friend that he's off to report Artilius for disturbing the peace.



> profile artil

Name: Artilius Mehath'hhs'mhhg
Spouse: No Info
Roleplay Stance: None
PvP Stance: Closed
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 09:26 AM CST
When someone does something like that, it's a good idea to report or assist and explain both that they appear to be attempting to disrupt scripters and that they are not acting like a PvP Closed person.



Thayet
@thayelf // http://thayette.tumblr.com

"But you must know that if corruption is powerful enough, it's not corruption at all — it's law. Unspoken, unwritten, but law." — Robert Jackson Bennett, City of Stairs
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 01:12 PM CST
Assist, not report. And stay in the queue until you're answered. Staff needs to be told about people doing this.

---
NaOH+HI
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 05:06 PM CST

How is casting spells any different than a necro summoning a construct. They do that at the guild too.

Or dragging people out of the hospital to cut them in line.

The list goes on and on of what could be considered disruptive.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 05:27 PM CST
>>How is casting spells any different than a necro summoning a construct. They do that at the guild too.

The issue is casting an offensive spells while having a Closed PvP profile. There is a reason Necros can not be set to Closed, and this is an example why.

>>CLOSED - This setting indicates that you prefer to do everything you can to avoid PVP.

Artilius attacking a room full of people because he felt like it does not seem like he wants to avoid PvP, and as such the GM's should know about it so they can set his PvP profile accordingly if he continues to act like that.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/12/2016 05:38 PM CST
>> The list goes on and on of what could be considered disruptive.

It's fine that people do those things; people are allowed to be/roleplay as jerks (within reason). I wasn't suggesting they get a warning. Their PvP setting just needs to appropriately reflect their behavior.



Thayet
@thayelf // http://thayette.tumblr.com

"But you must know that if corruption is powerful enough, it's not corruption at all — it's law. Unspoken, unwritten, but law." — Robert Jackson Bennett, City of Stairs
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/13/2016 02:06 PM CDT
Wouldn't casting that spell give consent to all the people it affected and they could attack regardless of his PVP stance?
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/13/2016 02:08 PM CDT
>>Wouldn't casting that spell give consent to all the people it affected and they could attack regardless of his PVP stance?

IIRC, yes.



Uzmam! The Chairman will NOT be pleased to know you're trying to build outside of approved zones. I'd hate for you to be charged the taxes needed to have this place re-zoned. Head for the manor if you're feeling creative.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/13/2016 02:37 PM CDT
If he wants to avoid PvP by all means (Closed), then why is he attacking a room full of people that probably couldn't kill him?
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 08:41 PM CDT
TBH, I suspect whoever is doing this is doing it in an attempt to get rid of the afk problem the ranger guild has so I'm torn on the issue.

On one hand, the level of afkness there is huge. Less so since the bannings started, but it's still one of the afk hotspots. And if it were my guild I'd be annoyed by that amount of people constantly afk. While I had two weeks off of work a short while before the bannings started happening a lot, I would be there at various highly different times all hours of the day and it was always the same core dozen people or so teaching the same classes, braiding the same vines, and kicking the same rock piles ad naseum.

On the other hand, the way whoever it is is going about it is kind of jerkish and isn't being very discriminate about who is completely afk and who is just being silent.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 08:46 PM CDT
>TBH, I suspect whoever is doing this is doing it in an attempt to get rid of the afk problem the ranger guild has so I'm torn on the issue.

Report is the acceptable tool for this. The GMs can penalize players more.

If that's not sufficient, then perhaps the vigilantes are simply doing the GM's jobs for them.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 08:55 PM CDT
I approve of anyone handling it at their level and not wasting development time AFK policing.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 09:03 PM CDT
Rule in the past has always been that you don't need a reason for removal. It's not your guildhall, you don't have a right to be there. Requiring reasons is a step down a bit of a slippery slope, because then you get into arguments about which reasons are good enough reasons and on and on. (If this is happening to Rangers, that's another matter, but I thought the ability to remove other Rangers got removed years ago.)

If they're using it to police AFKers, that sucks because they should really just be reporting the person and letting it get handled that way. That said, I know firsthand that isn't the only reason they're removing people; they also seem to be harassing anyone they aren't friends with, and they're goading and lying to multiple people into assisting with doing it, such as by telling people the person being removed was picking pockets when they weren't.

I don't think that necessarily justifies OOC reprisals under policy though it may justify having their ability to remove people taken away ICly for a time and perhaps being banned from the area themselves.



Thayet
@thayelf // http://thayette.tumblr.com

"But you must know that if corruption is powerful enough, it's not corruption at all — it's law. Unspoken, unwritten, but law." — Robert Jackson Bennett, City of Stairs
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 09:16 PM CDT
If it's their guild and they want to remove non-guild members for any IC reason (even if that reason is they are a jerk IC) I don't see a problem with it. If it's clear mechanics abuse then the affected party should assist or report if they have evidence.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/24/2016 10:04 PM CDT


Well it's worth noting that we were told in here that assist is the channel for dealing with this behavior in this thread, then in game told that there's no problem with this behavior, so there's a bit of a disjoint message here.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 08:25 AM CDT
Assisting lets staff know there's something going on that we can look deeper into, even if you're not told specifically that. Game Hosts are not always privy to what Game Masters are doing behind the scenes of an assist, so they can only tell you what policy and their training covers. Please don't take it out on them.

---
NaOH+HI
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 09:00 AM CDT


Per DR-ANNWYL, I have been asked not to post a transcript of my assist. Here's the rest of my post (with a summary):



I was removed from the ranger's guild a few days ago, with 27 more to go. There has been a clear pattern of repeated removals with no discussion or explanation. I'm very unhappy with this.

I did an assist in-game and the GM's response was that many actions can annoy people, so I should ask the room before doing anything. I've never seen anyone ask the room before braiding or collecting (and yes, I kick my piles and put detritus in the bucket/bin). Frankly, there are a hundred things that could annoy someone, and it seems silly to suggest I should ask every person in the room before doing anything. The other suggestion from the GM was that I just go somewhere else. There is nothing they can do about the removal and I have to wait out the 27 days.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 09:09 AM CDT
Is there some way that you being denied access to the Rangers guild is giving you a mechanical disadvantage? Are you a Ranger?
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 09:22 AM CDT
> Is there some way that you being denied access to the Rangers guild is giving you a mechanical disadvantage? Are you a Ranger?

I'm pretty sure the issue is that to even get back there they had someone let them in, but regardless of the invite any Ranger can get them kicked out and there has been someone kicking anyone they can out just because they can without apparent reasons.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 09:48 AM CDT
If someone wants to kick non-rangers out of a non-ranger area for x,y,z whatever IC reasons and that person by being kicked out is not subject to a mechanical disadvantage I don't see the issue. Now if other Rangers have an issue with it and wanted to petition the Ranger Guildleader to remove said persons ability to remove non-rangers then I don't see anything wrong with that either.

This appears to me more to be along the lines of person A (non-Ranger) got removed by person B (Ranger) got upset and ASSISTED. The GH then told them that they should deal with it IG or if they thought it was mechanical abuse to post to the boards. Person A posted to the boards.

I don't really see how the removal is putting person A at a mechanical disadvantage in any way.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 09:58 AM CDT
I'm pretty sure they got removed from the public area of the Ranger guild. I was removed from the guild in this manner around the time that this thread started for no reason, also. I was actually having a conversation with someone when I was removed and I had only been there for a few minutes before it happened. So the person/people doing are not doing it to stop AFKing or annoying behavior. They are just doing it to annoy people IMO.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/25/2016 06:26 PM CDT
I am a Ranger. I posted this thread because it is a chronic issue lately. If I had a way to know who exactly was responsible I would have taken it up with them, however I don't. I have issue with people constantly being removed day in and out for no reason at all. Especially when I'm in mid-conversation with people or listening to their class or both. If this was an occasional occurrence for reasons of x,y,z whatever, fine but the way it is now is extreme.

Last I knew it IS possible to remove a Ranger from the guild it just takes two other Rangers to request it, maybe even a circle requirement as well I'm not sure. At least that was the case several years ago I believe. It personally takes a ton for me to go the removal route for anyone let alone another guild member but if Xelten ever resubs I'll let you know.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/26/2016 12:52 PM CDT
There are a few problems with the code for removal that I identified and will be fixing. As for the reported abuse, staff is following up.

Here's how removal should work:
* Cannot remove Rangers.
* Ranger over 100th can remove someone alone.
* Two Rangers over 25th circle can remove someone together.

---
NaOH+HI
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 03/28/2016 01:49 PM CDT

Hmm. I could have sworn at one point it would take 2 rangers to remove another ranger but it was possible.

I know that the 2nd point isn't working correctly.

3rd one I have no clue about.
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 10/15/2016 12:19 PM CDT
I know this is late to the party... but last I checked two 100+ rangers could remove another ranger

~Purnay
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."
Reply
Re: The remove abuser 10/20/2016 02:54 PM CDT
I'm pretty sure even a 100+ (or 150+) circle ranger can't remove someone by themselves.

Looking back at logs from this year of times I have removed troublemakers, sometimes when I ask I get this message:

The journeyman nods and says, "All right. You say there is a problem with XXXXX's conduct. I'll get a couple guys to escort her out if someone else feels the need to complain about her."

...and sometimes I get this message:

The journeyman grunts, then nods and says, "This is not the first I've heard about this XXXXX. We cannot allow such rabble to remain in our distinguished guild." He gives a shrill whistle, summoning a pair of journeymen, and whispers quietly to them. They nod stiffly to him, and start moving off.



I am assuming the first message means I am the first person to ask them to be removed and the second means I was the second person to ask.
I have gotten the first message while kicking out people of a variety of guilds, so it isn't a case where it requires two rangers to kick out another ranger or anything.

I don't recall ever trying to kick out a ranger, but I have known a few who have been kicked out so I know it is or at least has been possible.
Reply