I fully appreciate why some Necromancy-aligned NPCs shouldn't be spoiled for who they are, but I'll admit it's a bit sad that books like "Demons and the Profane" can't be archived on epedia, because they're extremely cool and having to use sources other than epedia to reference that kind of lore is more of a frustration than a barrier.
I know part of why this is being done for now is to avoid people from meta-gaming the first time they end up seeing a "mysterious symbol" at worst or keeping the surprise of what something means at best, and I don't know where things are going with demons (in particular) as a whole, so I understand that I'm not really seeing the big picture here.
This is partially because connecting demons to certain spell proposals would be easier if there was a way to quickly pull their lore on epedia, so it's also a very self-serving request. I hope it's also clear that the whole reason why keeping it secret is something I find regretful is because it's a really interesting chunk of storytelling and I really do enjoy integrating the things I've learned into how my character has been developing so far, and I'd love to see more players integrate those little touches (although that's also possibly why it's kept in the dark - to avoid oversaturation).
Uzmam! The Chairman will NOT be pleased to know you're trying to build outside of approved zones. I'd hate for you to be charged the taxes needed to have this place re-zoned. Head for the manor if you're feeling creative.
