Prev_page Previous 1
DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 05:45 PM CDT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonrealms

The DragonRealms page on Wikipedia has been flagged as non-notable and is in danger of deletion. I'm sort of out of my depth when attempting to argue the ins and outs with Wikipedia editors, but I thought perhaps some Elanthipedia admins or other people with wiki experience might be on firmer ground with them.

Anyone with a neutral point of view want to have a whack at it? Anyone with a non-neutral point of view able to cite some references we might use in the article?

Additionally, according to Wikipedia, Elanthipedia does not have a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors.

The Wikipedia editors will not allow Elanthipedia to be used as an external link for the DragonRealms page. Can any Elanthipedia admins make the case for its allowance? I can't find the stats for the number of editors on Elanthipedia, or the "stability" of that wiki, unfortunately. I'm also not sure what they mean by substantial.

Legeres has apparently been fighting the good fight over there, however he is but one man, standing against a tide of staid, red-pen-wielding Wikipedians! DragonRealms (don't forget the in-cap) needs YOU to stand against this threat to our prosperity and way of life. I mean, um, to our Wikipedia page.

-- Player of Szrael --


"The Empath spellbook is a riddle trapped in an enigma hidden inside a lot of suck." (Armifer)
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 08:42 PM CDT
How are we supposed to find reliable sources when Hometown has been shutdown? :(

In all seriousness, I wish I knew of more sources to put in there.

Nikpack
player of more than I should list

Climbing List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Climbing_skill
Swimming List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Swimming_skill

And while I am evil, I try to avoid being just plain mean.
-Z
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 08:57 PM CDT
Some random references:

Could we use some of the info on the MUD site ranking pages like topmupsites? http://www.topmudsites.com/forums/mudinfo-cemm.html

This one's not to fancy but it does support the history of DR. http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/MUD

My favorite find. They seem to follow connectivity of MUDs out there. If being #1 of Fantasy related MUDs and #3 of all MUDS isn't notable, I donät know what is. http://www.mudstats.com/Game/DragonRealms.aspx

Nikpack
player of more than I should list

Climbing List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Climbing_skill
Swimming List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Swimming_skill

And while I am evil, I try to avoid being just plain mean.
-Z
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 09:35 PM CDT
i pretty much gave up on the wiki unless we can find a few outside sources for it, convince a newspaper to examine it or a gaming site to review both it and dragonrealms ::sighs::

also i found 3 references for dragonrealms itself, i just don't know how to stick em in the main area i keep getting errors. bring up notability isn't a popularity contest rule and that considering MUDs usually don't get reviewed at all 3 sources is pretty good. (gamespot, business wire, dragonrealms revisited)

--
If life doesn't need intelligence,
Then why should intelligence need life?
--
http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/User:Legeres
http://www.myspace.com/ledge_ear_us
http://legeres.deviantart.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 09:39 PM CDT
oops should of previewed(see the talk page for the reference sites, there's one there for popularity as well)

--
If life doesn't need intelligence,
Then why should intelligence need life?
--
http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/User:Legeres
http://www.myspace.com/ledge_ear_us
http://legeres.deviantart.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/29/2009 09:42 PM CDT
I started adding in the mudstats link I found and got instantly Red Penned. Having never edited wikipedia before, I suspect this happened because I was a brand new user. So I took it to the discussion folder. Hopefully someone will see it and agree with me.

Never say die!

Nikpack
player of more than I should list

Climbing List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Climbing_skill
Swimming List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Swimming_skill

And while I am evil, I try to avoid being just plain mean.
-Z
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 01:13 AM CDT
Who cares

Also, whose SS of SF is that on the wiki page? What a horrible SS why would you do that to DR? You're scaring away new people.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 05:32 AM CDT
I think the Astronomy link is actually just a mirror of the Wikipedia "MUD" article.

I'm not sure exactly why Elanthipedia and the mudstats sites are not being allowed. Even after laboriously trawling through all of the archived "external links" wiki guidelines that I could find -- they seem to be setting the bar for "substantial" number of editors for an external wiki pretty low, at like 100-200. The rule seems to have been put in place to prevent links to spam wikis with lots of ads and almost no new content.

The removal of many of the links actually seems to be the work of one editor -- if any DR player has some experience as a Wikipedia editor and can join in the debate in the DragonRealms talk page that might help a lot. Anyone with a reasonable claim to neutrality anyway -- though I'm not sure that anyone knowledgeable on any subject can reasonably claim total neutrality.

Wikipedia was such a cool idea but the vague "guidelines" and seeming disdain for new users make my teeth itch. I used to make anonymous edits all the time, which I thought was one of the "features" of wikipedia, but they were pretty much always reverted by a bot. What's the point?

-- Player of Szrael --


"The Empath spellbook is a riddle trapped in an enigma hidden inside a lot of suck." (Armifer)
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 05:40 AM CDT
>> if any DR player has some experience as a Wikipedia editor

...

Sigh.

God please don't make me go back there :( It's not hard to prove notability, you demonstrate its significance in the MUD market. Worse comes to worse you condense the DR article into the Simutronics article and do the same with GS and any others floating around...

Honestly there's a lot of cruft anyway so merging wouldn't be such a bad thing.



Rev. Reene

"...It is in the deserts and high places that religions are generated. When men see nothing but bottomless infinity over their heads they have always had a driving and desperate urge to find someone to put in the way."
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 11:01 AM CDT
Maybe this link will help?

http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,665958,00.html


Solomon


Fight me:
http://la-bubbita.mybrute.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 11:07 AM CDT
Or:

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/MUD




Solomon


Fight me:
http://la-bubbita.mybrute.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 11:12 AM CDT
http://archive.gamespy.com/legacy/articles/devweek_l.shtm


Solomon


Fight me:
http://la-bubbita.mybrute.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 11:13 AM CDT
Not sure it would help with this article, but I also recall a review of GS on GEnie in Dragon Magazine. That can always be used as a source reference if someone can track down the issue.

This was back when GS was one of two MMOGs in existence and was sufficiently positive to get me to sign up for GEnie instead of CompuServ, who had the other one.

-pete
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/30/2009 11:18 AM CDT
Also...

http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/GEnie_-_Games/id/1412919

http://www.raphkoster.com/gaming/mudtimeline.shtml


-pete
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/03/2009 11:56 PM CDT
Oh wow, that link to http://www.mudstats.com/Game/DragonRealms.aspx is friggin awesome. I remember years ago getting into this big flamewar about one of the other MUDs 'cheating' with the voting system on topmudsites.com because they were giving out ingame bonuses for going to vote for free advertising. DragonRealms doesn't do that, so we could never generate consistent enough voting to stay at the top of the rankings list.

While I understand the wanting the free advertising and the need to be at the top of the list to get it, I think my argument at the time was that it was disingenuous and invalidated the ranking list completely. Instead of a genuine ranking on popularity (most players), you had rankings of game playerbases most prodded/enticed to go vote.

Anyway, it's cool to see a site that shows the reality of the situation. DragonRealms and Gemstone at the top and, even now years later, still with numbers roughly twice the size of the next biggest competitor.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 05:13 AM CDT
>http://www.mudstats.com/Game/DragonRealms.aspx

It's kind of scary that the #1 MUD is of the genre "Furry (Adult)".




Aveda's Field Guide- http://dr.aveda.googlepages.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 05:16 AM CDT
<<It's kind of scary that the #1 MUD is of the genre "Furry (Adult)".

You haven't met a lot of Prydaens in DR have you?

Disclaimer: I don't think all or even most Prydaens are like this. But you'd be delusional if you didn't think a significant portion of them are.

-Evran

Crackling with unspent rage since 386AV.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 05:20 AM CDT
>> It's kind of scary that the #1 MUD is of the genre "Furry (Adult)".

::shudder::

The things I've seen...

You can't unsee them.

D:



Rev. Reene

Jhime whispers, "OOC: You're the biggest nerd i've ever known, but good job"
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 06:40 AM CDT
I too think the site is awesome. Now I only wish they published a history of their info as well. I'd love to see what the stats looked like say a year ago. Two years ago.

I can't quite figure out who runs the site nor how to contact them to request this though.

Nikpack
player of more than I should list

Climbing List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Climbing_skill
Swimming List:http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/Swimming_skill

And while I am evil, I try to avoid being just plain mean.
-Z
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 08:36 AM CDT
This isn't really accurate though

This great MUD needs help to get it up and running. Dragon Realms is more of a playerkillers role-play MUD, complete with Gods of good and evil to help them, should they player choose. For more information, come in and see.




Cute verbs and speaking from hiding are excellent ways to catch a lightning bolt in the face regardless of mystical ninja abilities.

-Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 10:13 AM CDT
Looks like it might link you to a different one also called dragonrealms.So some of the info in the main page folks linked to may be inaccurate. I clicked on one of the links and it was some one in England.

dragon realms vs dragonrealms

http://www.topmudsites.com/forums/mudinfo-drealms.html
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/04/2009 10:30 AM CDT
<<http://www.topmudsites.com/forums/mudinfo-drealms.html>>

Their website appears to be defunct.

Anyone try to telnet in?

Get me some contact info and I'll look into it if they're still around.

Solomon


Fight me:
http://la-bubbita.mybrute.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/05/2009 07:02 AM CDT
>>Their website appears to be defunct.
>>Anyone try to telnet in?
>>Get me some contact info and I'll look into it if they're still around.
>>Solomon


dynu.com was a free dynamic DNS web service which allowed you to host your own services from your computer, such as drealms.dynu.com's telnet service for the Dragon Realms MUD.

While the dynu.com website is offline, their nameserver seems to trace back to a dsl business account which is still running. Thier website/mail/ftp/services seems to have been out of operation since around March of 2008. Who knows how long it has been since the 'drealms' account on dynu.com stopped hosting the MUD, but it seems that it is definitely offline now and have been for awhile.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/10/2009 07:46 PM CDT
>>Their website appears to be defunct.



I wonder if a Few good ole Dwarves from Hibby came to see em one day and told em their name was a bit too close to realms they were en, and did an old fashioned Kneecapping Forfedhdar style.....
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 06:54 AM CDT
FWIW, I don't know what constitutes "Notability" in wikipedia, or even what's considered a valid "reference" on wikipedia, so I don't know if this will help, but here is a piece of old gaming history that references Dragonrealms:

Back in 2003 I made a Warcraft 3 map that was fairly popular on Battle.net, and it spawned tons of offshoots, gaming clans, websites, and international gaming leagues. When I made the map, all the heros and spells and abilities were based on DragonRealms. The original hero names on the map were named after the intial TF fallen players (which I was a part of), and I fit every guild into the map. There were empaths that (could not attack) and transferred HP and healed themselves, there were moon mages that dropped moonbeams, teleported around, traders that ran trade routes, bards that enchantes..etc... If anyone played wc3 during those years, and played DR, they would instantly recognize the characters from DR

The map wasn't as popular as DOTA, but it was a map where at its peak, tens of thousands of players played. Some people still play it today, but its more popular outside of the US. Back in 2006, A huge international competition gaming website, http://www.mymym.com/, did an in-depth article on my map and it mentions it being based on DragonRealms:

http://www.mymym.com/en/article/71.html

Googling also turned up this ETS article, which also mentions Dragonrealms
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Enfo's-Team-Survival

This site also has a nice long article on DR itself too
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Dragonrealms

I also stumbled upon a YouTube video of the oldschool gameplay from way back then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV_yhzso9kg

It shows two of the characters fighting off wave after wave (paladin and moon mage) of mobs...
Some notable abilities:
0:32 - Moon mage uses DO to kill Giant Salt Crabs and Gnolls.
1:16 - Moon mage casts Starlight Sphere and guides it towards her moonbeam where the Paladin is tanking.
1:25 - Moon mage turns the moon beam into Burn. Burn worked a bit differently than it does in DR, you cast it on an already-placed moonbeam, and it turns day into night and deals massive damage to all enemies at the moonbeam. Paladin then taunts the mobs to the moonbeam.
1:51 - Paladin uses Halt/Scales of Justice?, which is also quite different. It stuns both the Paladin and all mobs around him, and reduces his own health and the health of the mobs around to 1 hp.
2:11 - Moon mage opens a moongate in the line of the enemies, that teleports all enemies that steps through to the location of the moonbeam.. then she casts burn:)
2:50 - Moongate again, used defensively.




---
"All models are wrong, some are useful." -George C. Box
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 07:47 AM CDT
>This site also has a nice long article on DR itself too
>http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Dragonrealms

unfortunately i don't think it will work, it's almost an exact copy of what was the wiki article before they started chopping it up, including links and references

--
If life doesn't need intelligence,
Then why should intelligence need life?
--
http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/User:Legeres
http://www.myspace.com/ledge_ear_us
http://legeres.deviantart.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 07:50 AM CDT
(double post.. sorry)
aside from that, map looks awesome, i'm not sure if it can be used as a reference or not

--
If life doesn't need intelligence,
Then why should intelligence need life?
--
http://www.elanthipedia.com/wiki/User:Legeres
http://www.myspace.com/ledge_ear_us
http://legeres.deviantart.com
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 08:34 AM CDT
OMG!! You made ENFOS?

I'm guessing cause your name is ENFO. :P

I used to play it a lot. AND at the moon mage stuff... Wow :) I never connected the dots.

That game was a ton of fun.



Words are things, and a small drop of ink, falling like dew upon a thought, produces that which makes thousands, perhaps millions, think.

- Lord Byron
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 11:42 AM CDT
Umm...

Excessive travel time really shouldn't be on the list of Criticism.

I'm sure you traveled in WoW. Even WoW's travel time I don't mind but you really gotta acknowledge that aside from GuildWars which allows click-teleportation without spells/runes after you been to any outpost once, there's really no game where you can travel as fast as DR.

Any travel time complains in DR stems either from: 1) Avaialbility of ships (2 hours on the Skirr instead of every 10~15 minutes) but even then that's not a frequent trip by design. 2) Much of population being spoiled by the travel time such that some even suggested breaking the immersion by allowing 5 minute travels to M'riss. Even WoW intra-continental flight paths are longer than that.





"When I grow up, I want to be a soulless monster trapped in a suit of enchanted armor and compelled into violent service for a commercial institution through torturous psychic conditioning." -- Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 11:50 AM CDT
>>Excessive travel time really shouldn't be on the list of Criticism.

>>I'm sure you traveled in WoW. Even WoW's travel time I don't mind but you really gotta acknowledge that aside from GuildWars which allows click-teleportation without spells/runes after you been to any outpost once, there's really no game where you can travel as fast as DR.

This is one of the major reasons that until recently I never played WoW or any other Graphical MMO. I've been spoiled by DR. The only travel times I think are ridiculous in DR are the barges and gondola





Cute verbs and speaking from hiding are excellent ways to catch a lightning bolt in the face regardless of mystical ninja abilities.

-Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 01:40 PM CDT
>>Excessive travel time really shouldn't be on the list of Criticism.

>>I'm sure you traveled in WoW. Even WoW's travel time I don't mind but you really gotta acknowledge that aside from GuildWars which allows click-teleportation without spells/runes after you been to any outpost once, there's really no game where you can travel as fast as DR.

>>This is one of the major reasons that until recently I never played WoW or any other Graphical MMO. I've been spoiled by DR. The only travel times I think are ridiculous in DR are the barges and gondola

Err ... I haven't played WoW for awhile, but exactly what travel are you talking about that?

Unless you're sporting 60% mounts, travel in WoW = lawlz
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 01:46 PM CDT
>, but exactly what travel are you talking about that?

The post was saying "travel time" should not be one of the criticisms against DR in the posted link to the article discussing DR.





"When I grow up, I want to be a soulless monster trapped in a suit of enchanted armor and compelled into violent service for a commercial institution through torturous psychic conditioning." -- Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 01:48 PM CDT
I think he was referring to your comparing DR travel to WoW travel.

WoW travel is a joke


~Arwinia

The Empath spellbook is a riddle trapped in an enigma hidden inside a lot of suck.-Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 01:55 PM CDT
Oh, heh, I only found pain in walking between Barrens proper and Southern Barrens. Maybe Wetlands, too. Other than that it really isn't so bad. The mountain passage between Loch Modan and Dun Morogh was quite fun, Ashenvale and Feralas were gorgeous. In those cases the travel just added to the immersion.

Reaching Searing Gorge and Badlands did suck, though, especially for Horde. Forever to get there, forever to get around, and nothing to see.





"When I grow up, I want to be a soulless monster trapped in a suit of enchanted armor and compelled into violent service for a commercial institution through torturous psychic conditioning." -- Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 03:15 PM CDT
I'm more of an achiever than an explorer so the long walks in WoW annoy the crap out of me and there's no scripting it. DR Travel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WoW Travel




Cute verbs and speaking from hiding are excellent ways to catch a lightning bolt in the face regardless of mystical ninja abilities.

-Armifer
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 03:17 PM CDT
I've played that Warcraft map. It's crazy fun. I thought it was the funniest thing ever when I found it and it actually ended up being kind of cool.

Well done.



Rev. Reene

The black panther growls, "Are you blind Tachid? Kill Caelumia."
>
Tachid says, "SHE HAS BLUE FIRE"
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 05/25/2009 07:11 PM CDT
>>I'm more of an achiever than an explorer so the long walks in WoW annoy the crap out of me and there's no scripting it. DR Travel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WoW Travel

long walks? wtbh ... either never made it to lvl 40 (30 now), didn't know mages, or never heard of flightpaths.

As far as I'm aware the longest flightpath is still infinitely shorter than travel in DR.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/23/2010 02:10 PM CDT
WoW has steadily pared down travel times to the point where, come Cataclysm, for top level players, you'll probably never move much beyond whatever city you set up in. In Northrend as a Paladin on a 310% mount nothing is more than a few minutes away, and you're actually faster than the flight paths.

DR travel can be annoying, I suppose, if you don't use travel scripts, but most of us have been using them since ~1998, although previously you had to memorize the keystrokes and let muscle memory do the walking.
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/23/2010 03:12 PM CDT
>>although previously you had to memorize the keystrokes and let muscle memory do the walking.

Heh, I still use the ten key on SF. I can run the NTR from the crossing to the ferry in like 10 seconds now.


~Sulakhan



"Under the sword lifted high, there is hell making you tremble. But go ahead, and you have the land of bliss."

~Miyamoto Musashi
Reply
Re: DragonRealms Still Not Notable, Old, Popular 04/23/2010 03:47 PM CDT
Don't forget that the sand barge to Mus'par'i was recently made faster. The only other trips in game that are too long in my opinion are the ones to the islands and if you take the skiff from Ain Ghazal to....wherever it lands on the way to Raven's point or Hib.
Reply
Prev_page Previous 1