Made a quick version on epedia for those who might prefer that (and we'll probably need to move it there, anyway): https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Magic_3.2

---

Uzmam! The Chairman will NOT be pleased to know you're trying to build outside of approved zones. I'd hate for you to be charged the taxes needed to have this place re-zoned. Head for the manor if you're feeling creative.

<<>All TM - Fixed a bug that was capping damage too low. The cap will now mirror that of other ranged weapon attacks. This can only result in an increase in damage.

<<I'm not noticing a difference in casts to kill ratio with FST and Rebuke in Drakes. Are they a bad test subject for these spells?

Are you capping the spells? If not then you might have been below the bugged damage cap to begin with.

I'm talking about the damage cap - NOT the mana cap.

This would only crop up in situations where you were already getting a fairly powerful hit, to the point you were bumping into the max amount of damage we allow in a single strike. Without being there to parse out the combat data I can't see if it's coming into play for you or not but as a magic tert vs lava drakes I'm dubious it would factor into most strikes and it certainly wouldn't factor into Rebuke in that circumstance since each, weaker, shot is calculated out separately.

-Raesh

"It was wise enough to know itself, and brave enough to BE itself, and wild enough to change itself while somehow staying altogether true." ― The Slow Regard of Silent Things

When are we likely to see these wonderful changes rolled out? I'm looking forward to the warrior mage stuff.

I'm reading through the change log now. I don't have a magic user higher than level 10, so can't offer any useful insight aside from 'novice tm kill rat gud'.

I do have a NMU question though! Is there any plan to review them on a large scale similar to Magic 3.2? As far as I know, all NMU systems have been static since 3.0 (or earlier), whereas we're on magic 3.2 now. I'm just talking about the core of the NMU system, not specific abilities. Barbarians and thieves face issues not unsimilar to where Paladins/Rangers were/are, with strange regen/resource metrics.

I can't really speak for NMUs since they are largely outside of my area of expertise. There are staff members actively looking at those guilds but I don't want to speak for them.

I'll consider reducing the Heavy TM cooldown on test but I worry about that skewing expectations.

-Raesh

"It was wise enough to know itself, and brave enough to BE itself, and wild enough to change itself while somehow staying altogether true." ― The Slow Regard of Silent Things

>I can't really speak for NMUs since they are largely outside of my area of expertise. There are staff members actively looking at those guilds but I don't want to speak for them.

That's what I thought. Thanks for the quick and honest answer!

Raesh, is there any chance we could get a chance to resync our characters between prime and test? There's a significant gap between prime and test for me now, and the place I was in when I logged in at test doesn't leave me great hunting options near Crossing. It would be nice to have a chance to test some things in storm bulls.

- Saragos

I don't know if I've seen if there will be a spell wipe or not. I am asking because on my Ranger I have the Devitalize spell as my only TM spell. With the Ranger spellbook changes, he will need two pre-reqs for that spell. Will he just not be able to cast Devitalize? Or will that spell just get auto-unlearned? I am just wondering how that situation will be handled.

Perhaps if Alpha/Heavy attacks had a longer window where you can't run/move rooms after using?

>That'd be a pretty hefty departure from the hit-and-run tactics currently encouraged for thieves. Being rooted after a backstab would be... hilarious? I'm not for it, hehe.

I am but not seriously heh.

Rhadyn da Dwarb - Blood for fire!

Barbarian Guild Suggestions
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h4L5hAxR1-VLDegDNZBIhGdo5bMgnCtm84Icm2E0utU/edit#gid=0